Author Archives: CraigT

Lent 4 March 11: The crucifixion

LENT 4 CRUCIFIXION

The icon of the crucifixion has been chosen today because Jesus speaks of being lifted up on the cross. (John 3:14, cf. 12:32) “Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up.”

The crucifixion icon is different from a crucifix. The emphasis of a crucifix is on the suffering of Christ. Generally he has eyes open, indicating he is still alive, suffering, paying the price, building the treasury of merit. The Reformers rejected this, and instead emphasised that Christ is risen by displaying an empty cross, as at Mark the Evangelist. The Eastern Church, some 500 years before the Reformation, reacted differently. Rather than simplifying the symbol, the East added features. Christ is dead, eyes closed, body slumped, blood and water flowing. Christ’s life giving (sacramental) blood drips down on to the skull of Adam, revealed in a cave beneath the cross. (The Resurrection icon will show the risen Christ raising Adam and Eve from their graves.) While grounded on Calvary, the cross reaches into the sky, a bridge between earth and heaven. The walls of Jerusalem appear in the background, indicating that the place of crucifixion is outside the city, and therefore of a different order from that which goes on inside the walls. Mary and John are present, and a new community of mutual caring is created by the words, “Woman behold your son, son behold your mother”. (John 19:26) In John’s Gospel the crucifixion is a demonstration of the extent to which God’s love will go for our sakes. “God so loved the world that he gave his only Son…” (John 3:16) The new, caring community is to carry on this mission of Christ so that those who see Christ lifted up may be drawn to him and have eternal life. This done, Jesus says, “It is finished” (John 19: 30)

Today’s particular icon of the crucifixion is Byzantine in style, but with some Australia touches, most notably symbols of Melbourne and Sydney have replaced the walls of Jerusalem, for the death of Christ ushers in a community and a culture that is different from contemporary culture and fashion.

PRAYER

Father God, you so love the world that you gave your only Son.

We look not on the horror of this scene, but on the love exemplified, and in that we find glory;

Love amazing and divine,

Love that counts not the cost, and creates new community,

Love that offers eternal life, and draws all people.

Love in which we participate as we receive the bread and the wine, the body and the blood.

Blessed Son of God, live in us, and we in you,

Through your being lifted up, raise us from earth to heaven,

From bondage to liberation,

From despair to hope,

From death to eternal life. Amen.

 

MtE Update – February 28 2018

 

  1. Our worship space during Lent will feature a number of icons, increasing in number over the period to Easter. More details about this part of the worship can be found here, including a link to the icon for this Sunday, March 4: Lent 3
  2. Our Lenten studies for this year continue tonight, 630pm for soup supper and 700pm; details are here.
  3. A web page summarising our “Read it as if you wrote it” session last Sunday is available here.
  4. For those interested in some background commentary to the readings for this Sunday March 4, see the links here.

Lent 3 March 4: The cleansing of the Temple

Icon: The cleansing of the Temple

All too often this story has been used to justify violence. The argument goes, “Jesus used violence to drive the traders from the temple. Therefore there are situations where violence is warranted. Therefore this situation requires violence.”

The problem with this is not so much the fragility of the argument, as the distraction that it has become.

The emphasis should fall on the words of Jesus, “This is a house of prayer”. (A quote from Isaiah 56:7) Silence and prayer in the place of worship is paramount. Mark includes a second phrase from the Isaiah quote – “For all nations”. On one hand, the action of Jesus is an attack on the sacrificial system, for he drives out those who provide the animals for sacrifice, replacing those rituals with prayer. On the other hand, he also attacks the exclusiveness of temple worship, by overturning the tables where Roman money was exchanged for a special temple coinage.

All four Gospels refer to the cleansing of the temple, but there are differences, first in detail and secondly in placement.

In the synoptic gospels, this incident upsets the priests and it becomes the occasion for their determination to kill Jesus. For them it is an attack on the whole legalistic, sacrificial system, which Jesus wants to replace with a life based on grace that is available to all. Thus Matthew, Mark and Luke place the cleansing at the beginning of Holy Week. In John, the motive for the plot to kill Jesus is provided by the raising of Lazarus, and the subsequent popularity of Jesus.

John couples the cleansing of the temple with the wedding at Cana, where water is turned into wine. Both narratives contribute to the theme that Jesus takes something old and turns it into something new. “Destroy this temple and I will raise it in three days”. The new temple is the temple of his body, a place of prayer. Christian worship is to differ in kind from that of the Jerusalem temple. As Jesus explains to the Samaritan woman at the well, two chapters later, the physical location of worship, whether in Jerusalem on the Samaritans’ holy mountain, is not important. True worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth. (John 4:24)

The icon depicts the essentials of the narrative:

Jesus has a whip, though a tiny one,

One small table is overturned,

Coins are scattered,

A money changer flees with an empty box,

The cattle are two sheep and one goat,

The temple in the background is a series of courts.

But there is more in the icon than the narrative. One person with a small rope is not sufficient against so many. Some other power than the so called violence of Jesus is driving the merchants out.

Consider the architecture. Three arches dominate. Many Russian churches have this form, and it is always a symbol of the Trinity. Thus the temple is changed into something new. The icon adds a traditional device. A curtain indicates the difference between the seen and the unseen worlds. Above the curtain is the realm of the spirit, below the material realm where things can be seen and touched. This “temple” rises from the world below, pierces the curtain and provides a way into the presence of God. It is a place of prayer for all nations.

As I contemplate this icon, I feel I belong in the new temple of Christ’s body, and find peace and silence before God. Yet sometimes I wonder if there is still a bit more cleansing to be done within me, and within the church.

CONTEMPLATIVE PRAYER

Lord Jesus Christ, the temple of your body is a living reality, clean and pure.

Your body is my temple too.

Let me not stumble at the cleansing of my temple. Always there is need for me to grow, to leave something behind, something new for me to find.

The church is your body, your temple, and there is room for cleansing here too.

Come, cleanser of the temple.

                Come to your church, as it is today,

                Come to all nations and peoples, as they are today,

                Come to me, as I am today,

Come and create a house of prayer, and blessed silence, a hope for the world.

May worship in spirit and in truth prevail, and provide a foretaste of the world to come.

 

 

MtE Update – February 22 2018

 

  1. TONIGHT, 630pm: Brother Peter Bray from Bethlehem University returns to Melbourne, and is again hosted by MtE in a public forum; more details are here. If social media is your thing, please help to make this event known via the Facebook link.
  2. Our worship space during Lent will feature a number of icons, increasing in number over the period to Easter. More details about this part of the worship can be found here, including a link to the icon for this Sunday, Lent 2
  3. Our Lenten studies for this year begin next Wednesday, February 21, and Friday February 23; details are here. It would help to know if you plan to attend!
  4. “Read it as if you wrote it”. Attention all rostered (and potentially rostered!) in-worship Scripture readers: we’re planning a workshop on the important ministry of lector after morning tea this Sunday February 25 — “Read it as if you wrote it”. Please plan to be there if you’re able; those who don’t read the Scriptures for worship also welcome!
  5. For those interested in some background commentary to the readings for this Sunday February 25, see the links here.

Lent 2 February 18: The raising of Lazarus

The Gospel is Mark 8:31-38. The icon is the raising of Lazarus (John 11:1-53).

The reading from Mark follows Peter’s confession. Jesus predicts his death. Peter objects. He and the other disciples only partly see. Jesus talks about losing life to save it. There is no icon to match this passage, so the raising of Lazarus has been chosen for its parallel themes. Lazarus loses his life but saves it. There is talk about death and resurrection. Many come to believe, to see, but others do not. The event triggers the plot to kill Jesus.

The icon touches additional themes for contemplation:

  • Lazarus responds to Jesus’ command “Come out!” Life in Jesus defeats death. Also, coming to life in Christ is an experience of coming out of a personal tomb.
  • The raising is so that the glory of God may be seen. The life of the end-time can be known now.
  • “Jesus wept”. The story may touch our personal grief for loved ones lost.
  • The stronger the evidence of Christ’s life giving power, the more intense is the opposition.

This form of the icon was developed by the Novgorod school in Russia in the fifteenth of sixteenth century. It was re-interpreted by Solrunn Nes in her book “The Mystical Language of Icons” in 2,000, which was then used as a model for the icon you see here.

CONTEMPLATIVE PRAYER.

“Yours is the glory, risen conquering Son,
Endless is the victory, you, o’er death, have won.”
Jesus, I too am confronted by the powers of evil and death,
Strive with me.
I too have deep experiences of grief.
Weep with me.
I too must face death
Give me your life.
Lord, I believe, help my unbelief.

 

AN ADDITIONAL APPROACH.

This icon lends itself to the Ignatian method of contemplation. Imagine yourself as part of the scene. Move around, identifying with one person, then another. There is:

  • The worker opening the grave, and another unbinding Lazarus, hand on nose because of the stench,
  • Mary kneels at the feet of Jesus, as if washing them (John 11:2 & 12:3),
  • Martha, whose devotion seems a little more restrained,
  • The disciples gathered behind Jesus, seeing through him to the victory of life over death,
  • The crowd of Jews, looking in different direction. Perhaps the one with the philactory went to the Pharisees,
  • Lazarus, emerging into a new life,
  • Jesus, his red garment indicating humanity (Jesus wept) and the blue, divinity (“Come forth.”)

Come to rest where you find yourself most comfortable. If you were there, where would you be standing?

Reflect at length on where you are in your spiritual journey.

February 27 – George Herbert

These weekly “People to Commemorate” posts are a kind of calendar for the commemoration of the saints, reproduced here from a Uniting Church Assembly document which can be found in full here. They are intended for copying and pasting into congregational pew sheets on the Sunday closest to the nominated date.

Images (where provided) are of icons by Peter Blackwood; click on the image to download a high resolution copy of the image.

George Herbert, faithful servant

George Herbert (1593-1633) was an English priest and poet.  He was born in Wales, a younger son of a wealthy and well-connected family.  Although he excelled at Cambridge and won high preferment, he was disenchanted with his academic life, which did not suit his sickly constitution.  He also longed to move in the more exalted circles of state, and served briefly as a Member of Parliament, where he attracted the attention of noble patrons and King James I.  But these dreams came to nothing, and eventually he chose the path of ordination within the Church of England.  When he was counselled that this profession was socially beneath him, he replied, “I will labour to make it honourable by consecrating all my learning, and all my poor abilities, to advance the glory of that God that gave them”.  Sadly he served only three years as a priest in a small rural parish before his death, aged forty.

Herbert is counted among the “metaphysical poets”, and his work is concerned with religious devotion.  It is characterized by a close intimacy with God, a deep humility and sense of indebtedness and joyful gratitude.  There is also much introspective wrestling with his own sin and persistent rebellion against God, which perhaps reflects his long struggle before accepting his priestly vocation.  Herbert was an accomplished musician, and that is reflected in his verse, in the intricate and varied metrical patterns and short lyrical forms suggesting song.

Some of Herbert’s poems have been adopted as hymns; in The Australian Hymn Book and Together in Song, these include “Let all the world in every corner sing”, “King of glory, King of peace”, “Come, my way, my truth, my life”, and “Teach me, my God and King”.

The man who emerges from the poems is humble, witty and wise, deeply in love with God and well acquainted with himself; his verse overflows with the profound joy he has found in the love of Christ, abundantly but not cheaply.

The favourite poem Love is an apt illustration:

Love bade me welcome:  yet my soul drew back,

                   Guiltie of dust and sinne.

But quick-ey’d Love, observing me grow slack

                   From my first entrance in,

Drew nearer to me, sweetly questioning,

                   If I lack’d any thing.

A guest, I answer’d, worthy to be here:

                   Love said, You shall be he.

I the unkinde, ungratefull?  Ah my deare,

                   I cannot look on thee.

Love took my hand, and smiling did reply,

                   Who made the eyes but I?

Truth Lord, but I have marr’d them:  let my shame

                   Go where it doth deserve.

And know you not, sayes Love, who bore the blame?

                   My deare, then I will serve.

You must sit down, sayes Love, and taste my meat:

                   So I did sit and eat.

by Martin Wright

 

Lectionary Commentary – Lent 3B

The following links are to the Revised Common Lectionary commentary pages of Howard Wallace and Bill Loader, and are suggested as preparation for hearing the readings in worship for the Sunday indicated above.

Exodus 20:1-17 see also By the Well podcast on this text

Psalm 19

John 2:13-22 see also By the Well podcast on this text

1 Corinthians 1:18-25 see also By the Well podcast on this text

 

Reading the Scriptures in Worship

The ministry of lector (Scripture reader) in worship is a very important one. The reader’s role is to enable the first hearing of the Word of God, upon which the preacher will build.

It matters, then, that the readings are heard as clearly as possible. This is best achieved with practice beforehand, and a good sense for what the text is actually about. Practice will help to annunciate well – especially difficult Semitic names and places – and read at a hearable speed (which is generally slower than you might think!).

Yet a text can be well-read, in terms of annunciation and speed, and still be read wrongly or even misleadingly. Once you have the turn of phrase and speed for reading about right, you then need to read it as if you wrote it. This is a matter of allowing the emphasis to fall on the right words.

Consider, for example, the opening verses of much-loved Psalm 121

1 I lift up my eyes to the hills—
from where will my help come?
2 My help comes from the Lord,
who made heaven and earth.

If the emphasis falls on ‘hills’ in the first verse, then the implication is that this is the place where the Lord is to found: I look to the hills, where the Lord is to be found.

The ‘high places’, however, were locations for pagan worship. It is quite likely that the emphasis in verse 1 should fall on “my help”, echoed in the ‘My help’ and then “the Lord” of verse 2: others may look to the hills, but I look to the Lord.

The difference is enormous.

When we write and read our own texts, we naturally place the emphasis in reading on the points we are trying to make, because we know to whom we are writing, and why. A letter to the electricity company emphasizes that I’ve already paid the account. A love letter announces that I love you and you alone. Reading such things aloud comes naturally.

For the most part, the Scriptures are polemical writings, constantly drawing contrasts and bringing corrections to understandings of words and actions in the same way as our own writings do, only we didn’t write them. A clear reading of the Scriptures in worship requires understanding what it against which, and for which, the texts are arguing: help comes not from the pagan high places, but from the Lord.

There are many resources to assist in understanding the polemic of a biblical passage. Bible commentaries with critical-historical information are very useful. For Revised Common lectionary readings, good background on the texts can be found on the web pages of Bill Loader and Howard Wallace; links to these pages are usually circulated to MtE members in the Sunday before the readings are heard.

Another valuable resource – usually a bit more extensive in its comment than the Loader and Wallace pages, is the Texts for Preaching series. These are available in hard copy or electronic form and are well worth the expense (about $100 for the 3-volume set).

If the text for a Sunday doesn’t come from the set reading, then try to find a general commentary on that book, or simply ask the preacher where he or she thinks the emphasis falls!

« Older Entries Recent Entries »